蒲公英 - 制药技术的传播者 GMP理论的实践者

搜索
查看: 2334|回复: 7
收起左侧

[FDA药事] Will the FDA Continue Its Initiative "cGMPs for the 21st Century"?

[复制链接]
药士
发表于 2016-1-2 23:11:57 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

欢迎您注册蒲公英

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
Will the FDA Continue Its Initiative "cGMPs for the 21st Century"?

What does the FDA expect? What is the state of the art? In which direction does the FDA move? These and similar questions are asked time and again in the pharmaceutical industry. One of the answers is: The FDA expects the implementation of the GMP guidelines (21 CFR 210/211). Another answer can e. g. be found in the FDA guidances for industry. Even though they are not legally binding, they represent FDA's "current thinking". And where is the FDA headed? To answer this question, one can consult different sources. Among them are the documents called "white papers", which describe future developments, as well as FDA's reports.

Many know the Initiative "cGMPs for the 21st Century: A Risk-Based Approach". This report was published in 2004. Since then, one has not heard much about it from the FDA. Still, the FDA published an "Update Report" in 2007, which is not well known even among insiders.

You can find this report at: http://www.fda.gov/oc/cgmp/report0507.html.

The 2007 report describes the changes since the first report on the FDA initiative "cGMPs for the 21st Century" published in 2004. Besides, it is meant to show that the topic is still up to date and therefore being pursued. In principle, the FDA initiative concentrates on 5 points:

Reinforced introduction of new technologies in the pharmaceutical industry
Facilitated integration of modern quality management techniques into all areas of the pharmaceutical industry
Implementation of risk-based approaches in order to concentrate on essential issues in the industry AND in the FDA
Ensuring that regulatory activities (review, compliance, inspections) are conducted according to the pharmaceutical "state of the art"
Improving consistency and co-ordination of the FDA "Drug Quality Regulatory Program"

The 8-page overview then addresses activities in connection with the FDA initiative. First it deals with the topic of communication. Here the text lists workshops held between 2005 and 2007, but also draft guidances. The paragraph on Quality Management Systems describes internal and external activities. It explains different systems that have been developed or implemented (e. g. CMC Review). A separate paragraph is dedicated to international co-operations, among others the participation in the ICH and potential PIC/S membership. Another section describes the FDA's PAT activities. Interestingly, the text expressly points out a PAT Committee founded recently by the ASTM. What is also mentioned is the establishment of a Pharmaceutical Inspectorate within ORA as well as the scientific collaboration with universities and the introduction of "standards" for the acceleration of procedures. A detailed statement is given on Quality by Design.

The remaining 14 pages encompass 20 appendices giving further insight, e. g. into the respective working groups.


A particularly interesting feature is Appendix 19 "Quality by Design Graphic".

Quality by Design Graphic.



This leads us back to the starting point of the question: "What is to be expected in the future?" One could express it in the catchy phrase: "Everything is Quality by Design." The FDA considers "Quality by Design" to be playing a pivotal role in drug manufacture. It results in the corresponding designs for the process and the product accompanied by a suitable control strategy with the objective to maintain process understanding and product knowledge. And all of this is intended to be continually improved. Here, we can see a direct reference to the methods coming from the field of six sigma. One possible method for controlling and understanding a process could e. g. be statistical process control (SPC).

The FDA will adhere to the adopted path, i. e. go in the direction of Quality by Design and Quality Risk Management. This is also shown by the current US discussions on the FDA Foreign Inspection Program. FDA Commissioner Andrew C. von Eschenbach stressed the fact that a reaction to the new complex structure of the pharma supply chain must be based on a risk-based inspection practice.

Author:
Sven Pommeranz
On behalf of the European Compliance Academy (ECA)
GMP_News_1186.gif
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
 楼主| 发表于 2016-1-2 23:14:02 | 显示全部楼层
Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century - A Risk-Based Approach(2004)
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Develop ... Drugs/ucm137175.htm
Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st Century A Risk-Based Approach Progress Report(2007)http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDER/ucm128080.htm
回复

使用道具 举报

药生
发表于 2016-1-2 23:15:27 | 显示全部楼层
药品生产风险管理方法,不错不错。
回复

使用道具 举报

药士
发表于 2016-1-3 00:26:36 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药生
发表于 2016-1-3 15:42:05 | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报

药生
发表于 2016-1-4 22:15:20 | 显示全部楼层
这个图有点意思
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2016-1-10 17:11:53 | 显示全部楼层
英文的,看不懂
回复

使用道具 举报

药徒
发表于 2016-1-10 17:13:03 | 显示全部楼层
会的,也在继续中。是否一定要打着这个旗号则不一定。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

×发帖声明
1、本站为技术交流论坛,发帖的内容具有互动属性。您在本站发布的内容:
①在无人回复的情况下,可以通过自助删帖功能随时删除(自助删帖功能关闭期间,可以联系管理员微信:8542508 处理。)
②在有人回复和讨论的情况下,主题帖和回复内容已构成一个不可分割的整体,您将不能直接删除该帖。
2、禁止发布任何涉政、涉黄赌毒及其他违反国家相关法律、法规、及本站版规的内容,详情请参阅《蒲公英论坛总版规》。
3、您在本站发表、转载的任何作品仅代表您个人观点,不代表本站观点。不要盗用有版权要求的作品,转贴请注明来源,否则文责自负。
4、请认真阅读上述条款,您发帖即代表接受上述条款。

QQ|手机版|蒲公英|ouryao|蒲公英 ( 京ICP备14042168号-1 )  京ICP证150354号  互联网药品信息服务证书编号: (京)-非经营性-2024-0033

GMT+8, 2024-11-11 20:16

Powered by Discuz! X3.4运维单位:苏州豚鼠科技有限公司

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

声明:蒲公英网站所涉及的原创文章、文字内容、视频图片及首发资料,版权归作者及蒲公英网站所有,转载要在显著位置标明来源“蒲公英”;禁止任何形式的商业用途。违反上述声明的,本站及作者将追究法律责任。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表