金币
UID133363
帖子
主题
积分2606
注册时间2013-8-18
最后登录1970-1-1
听众
性别保密
|
发表于 2020-1-9 15:55:07
|
显示全部楼层
百度搜,汽化过氧化氢与过氧化氢干雾对比。
Our study has showed that 1 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE VAPOUR system was more effective than 2 aHP systems for the inactivation of G. stearothermophilus BIs and that cycles were faster for the HYDROGEN PEROXIDE VAPOUR system. Since the data suggesting a clinical impact relate to the HYDROGEN PEROXIDE VAPOUR system and not to the aHP system, the aHP system lacks published in vitro efficacy against key nosocomial bacteria (especially the catalase-positive bacteria13), and on the basis of the results of our study, the HYDROGEN PEROXIDE VAPOUR system was superior in our setting.
我们的研究表明:1台汽化过氧化氢系统比2台aHP系统对于嗜热脂肪芽孢杆菌BIs灭活效力好。,而且循环周期快。由于研究数据表明临床应该采用汽化过氧化氢系统,aHP系统(过氧化氢干雾扩散器)对于院感细菌的灭活率(特别是氧化酶阳性菌)低。因此基于我们的研究,汽化过氧化氢更优。
|
|