金币
UID176556
帖子
主题
积分25192
注册时间2014-6-6
最后登录1970-1-1
听众
性别保密
|

楼主 |
发表于 2017-8-7 19:29:46
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 beiwei5du 于 2017-8-7 19:31 编辑
官方的回复还是允许的!!!!但是不赞成用员工编号进行记录填写
433. Several comments on 211.182 and 211.186 recommended that the requirement for signatures be deleted or modified to provide for initials, or other specific employee identification, e.g. an employee number. The Commissioner is persuaded that the requirement for a full signature may not be warranted in view of the space that would be required in the records and the burden of continually writing a full signature on records that are repetitive. For less repetitive type of records, such as master records referred to in 211.186, the Commissioner has decided to retain the requirement for a full signature. The Commissioner rejects the suggestion that a distinctive employee number be allowed because it would detract from the concept of personal involvement. Numbers, in the Commissioner's opinion, may be easily recorded by persons other than those who actually perform the function.
|
|